The Hard Question

Sometimes I wonder why should some question become so difficult for one to ask and even though those questions are asked, there seems to be difficulty in giving the proper answers. The hard question lies always between our hearts and sometimes our stream of consciouness judges us by holding us accountable, for us not to reminisce our thoughts it is advisable to note that writing is very important especially if we sideline the relevant parts of the hard question by taking into cognisant the way to ask the question which implies composition and building a strategy to curb it. Hard question are often very rare. Some of these are: where is God? Will the world come to an end? Will revolution take its place etc many people has different notion and possess hard questions to ask and they tend to hold it back to their innate nunnery mind. Some, if being ask, people tend to poised loathing habits on the questioning, so is better to hold it back and tag it as the hard question. What people tend to forget is that ideology and faith are in constant battle everyday because they varies. Peple formulate ideology everyday some base on empirical evidences while others on notions, faith too are base on point of views in the name of religion, since faith is define as indoctrinating the indoctrinator, these two notion always collide with each other. In a discussing class especially classical thinkers disagree with faith as in where religion is taking into bigotry, they tend to pose this question what is the stand of religion. If the question is being thrown to an neoextremists or fanatic he will look at it as a mere jargon, this is where conflicts always arises, it is worthy to note that the hard question are taking always in leniency in different part of the world. Because of the axiom thats one man food is anothers’ man poison so conflicting ideas always emerged the hard question has been kept hidden like salt. Since we are in a free world hard question need to be ask freely.

Revolution: the Few and the Masses

The world has started to evolved round but this time not in geographical evolution concept but is, in the notion of the axiom which says change is constant. Since, change is the only constant thing in humans and as well as matters and animals, revolution is inevitable as death. I wonder why men choose the path of doing evil rather than of good. This is were democracy comes into being whereas scholars have defined it as were majority voices are on stake but reverse is the case. After the reverence of the majority in order to bring person (a few) into power, the subjected few will decide to do good because of necessity after getting what he desire, he let go off the hands of the people. ;(I can of imagine why will the masses decision never be agreed upon even with mass demonstration using placate to shown their aggrievance rather the few will send their agent to offense the crowd. Not knowing the masses are many, the more injury we substain the more courage and rage we employ and pick to brazen up our quests. This is where I agree with Socrates that democracy is the worst system of government it breeds anarchy, tryanny and aristocracy. Where few decide upon many. If truly, democracy is meant for people as Abraham Lincoln has vouch then why should the people voice and demand not be heard in haste, if the few are there for the masses. The masses continue to pursue and push their cause and the few on the other hand continue to revert it. Not minding that if 50000 people march to Senate for the removal of one few it is possible for the masses goal and objectives to be achieved. The police and the army should stop their offensive attacks on poor armless people whose weapons are placate, papers and pen. The best weapon on earth is to put it in writing. And this can be done through papers and pen. So democracy is just a word if people are starving and suffering, if people need things and are not giving, if people call for your resignation and you refuse to resign then why are you imposing yourself on those who don’t want you. The army and police are a powerful institution in a country, i indulge them to side with the masses when there is an uprising or revolution because they elected the few and they needed change in the systems that is they embarked on the revolution process, through peaceful protests. History has not recorded any protesters protesting with a weapon but it is done with a placate peacefully but when shove turns to push only then do they react. A state should be strong when the masses decide not to follow the will of the few rather than build an everlasting peace and harmony among the masses and the few, if the few willing step aside for the will of the people who brought him into power. But, the few runned it as an enterprises where he drive the state like a car and bash it into a pole with a strap seat belt only to come out safely not minding the well being of the car other damage or not simply because of selfish interest, he trys to institutionized all the institutions into his hands in order to exploit and suppress the masses. Since revolution is evolving round the globe we can of embrace it and support those with solidarity strength if it is done without racial discrimination, religious bigotry, sentimentalism just to mention a few but under the auspices of respect for human, equality and justices and free will of all humans. So the few should always pave way to the masses to achieve their desire which is revolution not by curbing it with their agents. The agents should remember that the masses are they one who elected the few, to the power, and power is trust. Since the trust has been breached, the masses has right of free will to assert it back. Since time is the father of truth, the world must experience revolution, only time can stop it.